Today, November 9, 2013, reported on Reuters, the U.S. government
urged that Bank of America pay $863.6 million in damages after a
federal jury found Bank of America liable for fraud over defective
mortgages sold by its Countrywide unit. The case centered on a
mortgage lending process at Countrywide, which Bank of America bought
in July 2008, known as the "High Speed Swim Lane," or
alternatively "HSSL" or "Hustle." Government
prosecutors said Countrywide's program emphasized and rewarded
employees for the quantity rather than the quality of loans produced,
and eliminated checkpoints designed to ensure that loans were sound.
The Hustle case, like some other financial crisis cases recently
pursued by the government, was brought under the Financial
Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act, a law passed
after the 1980s savings-and-loan scandals.
The lawsuit is the first government case to go to trial over the
faulty mortgage practices that led to the 2008 financial crisis.
A
new wave of claims against financial institutions and rating agencies
could breathe new life into an old law. Federal prosecutors have
turned to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement
Act of 1989 (FIRREA). FIRREA is a civil anti-fraud law passed in the
wake of the savings and loan crisis.
FIRREA
was passed, in part, to “enhance the regulatory and enforcement
powers of Federal financial institutions’ regulatory agencies.”
The obvious precedent event was the Savings & Loan Crisis that
caused billions of dollars in losses to investors and federally
insured deposit funds. Read more about FIRREA
Net income is what
remains of a company's revenue after subtracting all costs. It is
also referred to as net profit, earnings, or the bottom line. Net
Income that is not paid out in dividends is added to retained
earnings. On October 16, 2013 Bank of America Corporation reported
net income rose to $2.5 billion in the third quarter of 2013 from
$340 million in the year-ago quarter.
I admit that $864 million
sounds like a lot of money, a whopping fine. But when you do the
math, its not much. The proposed fine resulting from the FIRREA based
law suit I mentioned, represents only .345% of Bank of America's most
recent quarterly net. One quarter, Q3 only. Less than 1% of one
quarter's net. How bad is that slap on the hand going to hurt?
According to
RealtyTrac.com - November 2013.
Although many media types
continually speak of the foreclosure crisis, and the world financial
crisis in the past tense. We are not past it. The nightmare
continues. There are currently 1,254,701 properties in U.S. that are
in some stage of foreclosure. In September, the number of properties
that received a foreclosure filing in U.S. was 2% higher than the
previous month.
According to an article
published in Huffington Post in May 2013, Americans lost $192.6
billion in wealth, or an average of $1,700 per household, in 2012 due
to foreclosures. The article also stated that the U.S. could lose $221 billion more within the next year if officials
don't come to the aid of millions of borrowers who owe more on their
homes than they're actually worth.
And in the Fall 2012
issue of "Democracy, A Journal of Ideas", declared that wealth stripping
has increased during the economic crisis. Since the onset of the
Great Recession, Americans have lost $7 trillion in equity in their
homes. The Federal Reserve estimates the median American family has
lost nearly two decades of wealth, or almost 40 percent of their
assets. In a separate report, the Pew Research Center estimates that
Latinos, Asians, and African Americans have experienced wealth losses
of 66 percent, 54 percent, and 53 percent respectively, compared to
13 percent for whites. These losses are largely due to home
foreclosures and lost equity.
So, no, less than 1% of one
quarter earnings as a fine for Bank of America is not nearly enough
to put a dent in the damage done.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment!