First printed October 14, 2005 in the
Daytona Beach News Journal
Has Anything Changed???
Not all sex offenders are sexual
predators, but all sexual predators are sex offenders. Both classes
of sex offenders are handled in much the same way. Sex offenders are
obligated to report their current address and any subsequent address
change to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement for a a period of
time ranging from 10 years to life.
Sex offenders are required to disclose
their offense on job applications. Sex offenders are prohibited from
seeking refuge in most public shelters during hurricanes or other
emergencies. Sex offenders are prohibited from working in any job
where they might come into contact with children. Sex offenders are
prohibited from living less than 1,000 feet from places where
children might congregate; less than 2,500 feet in cities that have
passed such ordinances.
The term sex offender encompasses a
wide range of sexual offenses, differing in degree of seriousness.
In Florida, the charge once called
statutory rape – consensual sex with an underage partner – is
sexual battery. The underlying legal reasoning is that a minor child,
anyone under 18, is legally unable to give sexual consent, therefore
consensual or not, any sexual act is battery.
Individuals who have been charged with
a sex offense, and whose adjudication has been withheld via a plea
arrangement, are likely to be considered sex offenders. Attempted
rape upon a 14 year old victim is a sex offense. That attempted rape,
if it had been carried out with violence, likely would have earned
the perpetrator a felony sexual battery charge and designation as a
sexual predator. The family member, neighbor or acquaintance that
lures a child with gifts or attention in exchange for sexual favors
is likely to be a sexual predator, depending on the age of the
victim, frequency of the crimes and whether there was violence or
threats of violence. The silent stranger that steals a child in the
night, then rapes and kills is a sexual predator.
I recently checked the sex offender
registry to find out how many sex offenders live with a a one mile
radius of my house in unincorporated Holly Hill, and within a one
mile radius of my mother's house in Ormond Beach., beachside. Let me
tell you, there are plenty. But the funny thing is, there are not may
sexual predators listed at all. I would say not more than one percent
of the former on the list. It seems obvious to me, that it is the
sexual predators that we need to worry about. It is the sexual
predators who commit violent or serial rape, who steal and rape the
children and who bribe young children for sexual favors.
I suggest that we, as a society, stop
the hysteria – end the witch hunt. I have no problem with
monitoring the whereabouts of sex offenders, especially sexual
predators who are the worst of the worst. But, I think we need to
take a closer look at how we monitor the lesser sex offenders, the
hapless individuals who were dumb enough to make a stupid and serious
one time criminal mistake.
As municipalities busy themselves
passing ever more stringent restrictions on sex offenders, I wonder
whether these offenders finally will dare to stand up for themselves
and question the constitutionality of these laws. I wonder whether
these offenders who have served their time in prison and paid their
societal debt will ever successfully reintegrate into society when
society can't stop piling on the sanctions, sanctions that are there
to satisfy agendas of law and order politicians and assuage our
collective guilt.
The guilt, rightly placed, belongs
first to the offender, second to the parents of the young victims and
third to society in general. There always will be criminals,
individuals with evil or greed or cruelty in their hearts.
Parents have an obligation to be ever
vigilant to protect their children from harm. Parents must be aware,
and even suspicious of the adults who come into contact with their
children. Most child molesters know their victims, and most child
molesters are known by the parents of the victims. Individuals who
seem too interested in their children, or want to spend an inordinate
amount of time with their child, or seem to give too many gifts or
favors might be cues to possible danger. The suspicion might be
unfounded; we can hope.
Parents also can teach their children
to be aware of danger signs, once the children are old enough to be
out of their parents' sight, and once the children are old enough to
understand. Adults do not need to ask young children for driving
directions. Adults do not need a young child's help in finding a lost
puppy. Adults do not give gifts of toys or candy or ice cream to
young children unless they want something in return.
We, as a society, must accept the task
of enacting and enforcing responsible laws to protect our citizens.
We ought not succumb to mass hysteria, which in the end, does but
make us afraid. We ought to learn and make the distinction, in our
law making and enforcement, between the truly dangerous predator and
the lesser sex offender. Let us watch closely the truly dangerous and
violent who walk among us, and allow those others to get on with
their lives.
You are very good author of legal articles, I wish you to write something to the section of prison legal news on Attorney Online. You and your friends who provide legal services also can submit contacts to Attorney directory and post to Attorney Blog. By the way I also can write something to your legal blog. Contact me please.
ReplyDeleteYou pose compelling arguments. The "one size fits all" approach to sex offender monitoring and enforcement is costing more money, time, and resources that could be better spent on greater enforcement and therapy directed to the sexual predator.
ReplyDeleteWe have to create a cost-effective system for assessing which sexual offenders can be "salvaged" and safely brought back into the main stream with therapy and with incentives for living a crime-free life. You cannot stop sex offenders from becoming sexual predators by treating all of them like sexual predators!! Yes, we must protect ourselves from the worst of the bunch by incarcerating them. My remarks are not intended to give any quarter to people who engage in deplorable, non-consensual sexual acts against other people, no matter the victim's age. However, as research as shown, if you treat people like animals, they will gradually adopt that as a lifestyle either in defiance of unjust treatment or because it's the only social identity they can have. And when these people are no longer incarcerated or otherwise restrained, then what? Whatever the method we decide upon to segregate sex offenders who simply have appetites that do not involve non-consensual, deceptive contacts with others from the predators whose desires require non-consensual, prohibited contact with others, we must make absolutely sure it is NOT creating more of the "monsters" that we so dread.